Papers
arxiv:2609.35303

PIVOT: Pivot-Aware On Policy Self Distillation for Multi-Turn VLM Agents

Published on Sep 28
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

PIVOT is an RL framework that internalizes failure localization and state restoration into token-level updates to eliminate environment rollbacks, improving multi-turn VLM agent accuracy.

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) via Group-Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) is widely used for multi-turn VLM agent training, yet it suffers from zero-gradient silence on uniform failures and coarse episode-level credit assignment. While On-Policy Distillation (OPD) and On-Policy Self-Distillation (OPSD) mitigate sparse rewards using hindsight information, their underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Through controlled counterfactual rollback probes across five multi-turn VLM agent benchmarks, we reveal that performance gains in OPSD/OPD are largely driven by physical state rollback at the pivot step, defined as the first unrecoverable action without remaining step budget. However, physical state rollbacks are computationally prohibitive and infeasible in real-world environments. To bridge this gap, we present Pivot-Aware Internalized Visual On-Policy Training (PIVOT), an RL framework that internalizes pivot localization and state restoration directly into token-level parameter updates, eliminating environment rollbacks during RL training and additional skill hints at test time. PIVOT unifies three functional roles within a single architecture: a failure Analyzer non-invasively localizes the pivot step and diagnoses failure modes from visual trajectory collages and action logs; a detached Teacher re-scores failed tokens under this privileged diagnostic context; and a Student optimizes joint GRPO and confidence-gated OPD objectives. At test time, both Teacher and Analyzer branches are stripped. Evaluated on five multi-turn VLM agent tasks across cognitive grid puzzles, 3D embodied control and navigation, and generative reasoning, PIVOT achieves 0.90 overall accuracy on Qwen2.5-VL-3B (+8% over SFT+GRPO baseline and +5% over previous SOTA) and scales to 0.92 on Qwen3-VL-2B (+12% over SFT+GRPO baseline).

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2609.35303
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.35303 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.35303 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.35303 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.