Inducing Process Supervision from Outcome-Only Reinforcement Learning
Abstract
Process reward models (PRMs) have become a key component for LLMs, as their step-level feedback supports both post-training and test-time reasoning. However, training strong PRMs remains costly: human step annotation is difficult to scale, while Monte Carlo estimation is computationally expensive and can drift from the intrinsic correctness of steps. To get effective PRMs at low cost, we introduce TIPS (Thinking-Induced Process Supervision), an outcome-only reinforcement learning (RL) framework for training generative PRMs. In TIPS, the model generates a chain-of-thought (CoT) followed by step-level labels and an outcome label. The reward depends solely on whether the predicted outcome matches the ground truth, and the resulting group-relative advantage is used to optimize the entire generated response. Intuitively, when checking intermediate steps helps determine the outcome, more accurate checks can lead to better outcome judgments and higher rewards. Outcome-only RL can therefore reinforce step-level verification without explicit process supervision. We validate the effectiveness of TIPS across math and agent benchmarks and four backbone families. Notably, TIPS-Qwen3-4B-Thinking-2507 reaches 85.2 F1 on ProcessBench with only 3.2K outcome-labeled trajectories, surpassing all evaluated trained PRMs and strong prompt-only judges such as GPT-5.4-Instruct and Claude-4.7-Opus, while still trailing o1-mini. Code and data are available at https://github.com/RUCBM/TIPS.
Community
Can strong process reward models emerge from outcome-only reinforcement learning?
We introduce TIPS (Thinking-Induced Process Supervision), a simple framework that trains generative PRMs using only outcome-level correctness rewards, without human step annotations, Monte Carlo rollouts, or explicit process supervision.
By rewarding accurate outcome judgments, TIPS implicitly encourages models to verify intermediate reasoning steps. With just 3.2K outcome-labeled trajectories, TIPS-Qwen3-4B-Thinking achieves 85.2 F1 on ProcessBench, outperforming all evaluated trained PRMs and strong proprietary LLM judges, including GPT-5.4-Instruct and Claude-4.7-Opus.
Our results suggest that process supervision can emerge from outcome-only RL, offering a scalable and cost-effective path toward stronger reasoning verification.
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Learning Process Rewards via Reasoning State Propagation (2026)
- Cliff: Learning Process Rewards from the First Mistake (2026)
- PRO-Step: Step-level Process Reward Optimization for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (2026)
- Co-RL: Unsupervised Reasoning Emerges from Diverse Cohort in Multi-agent RL (2026)
- EnGRICH: Enhancing Generative Reward Modeling with Critiques from Humans (2026)
- ConsensusBench: Benchmark of Consensus Nodes for LLM Reasoning via Outcome Reward Densifying (2026)
- Gradients Know What Outcomes Don't: Unlocking Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning with Gradient-Aligned Rewards (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2609.36641 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 1
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper