Abstract
Multimodal language models (MLLMs) exhibit promising spatial reasoning capabilities, yet the internal mechanisms supporting them remain poorly understood. We uncover S-Space, a linear representation subspace in which object-token representations encode continuous coordinates along horizontal, vertical, and distance axes. Although we identify these axes by differentiating spatial-answer scores with respect to object-token activations, S-Space is intrinsic rather than induced by specific data or prompts, remaining readable under non-spatial questions. We show that S-Space functions as an internal spatial workspace of MLLMs. Perception encodes object locations into it, forming spatial representations that can be directly read out to support accurate spatial judgments. Internal reasoning transforms it for changing viewpoints. Verbal responses selectively access it, evidenced by causal interventions that alter spatial judgments while largely preserving non-spatial responses. Case studies further show that S-Space assigns locations to unseen entities and the observer, and connects physical directions with abstract linguistic meanings, suggesting both the capabilities and limitations of large-scale language training. Finally, we use S-Space as a diagnostic tool for spatial reasoning failures. Direction-word readouts reveal systematic coupling between cardinal and image-relative reference frames. More importantly, a perception-computation decomposition exposes a key bottleneck: MLLMs can form capable spatial representations, yet fall short in the spatial transformations required to reason reliably across viewpoint changes.
Community
What does it mean for an AI to understand space? ๐
Not just to recognize what is in front of it, but to build an internal world: where things are, how they relate, and how that world changes when the viewpoint changes.
We found evidence that multimodal models have already begun to build such a world inside themselves.
We call it S-Space ๐ง โ an internal spatial workspace that can be read, manipulated, and transformed during reasoning.
A glimpse into how AI may learn not just to see the physical world, but to reconstruct and reason within it. โจ
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Grounding Isn't Knowing: Do VLMs Need Object Localization for Spatial Reasoning? (2026)
- LeRF: Learning Reference Coordinate Frames for Perspective Taking Reasoning (2026)
- Who Is Left of Whom? Tracing Spatial Evidence and Role Binding in Relative-Position Reasoning (2026)
- Uruqi: Learning Spatial Cognition from Visual Experience (2026)
- INTCORT: Training-Free Spatial Reasoning Enhancement for Vision-Language Models via Input Transformations and Confidence Routing (2026)
- SpaceCast-Bench: Evaluating Predictive Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models (2026)
- From Sight to Foresight: Predictive Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.13527 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper