Sensorimotor Alignment: A Platonic Proxy for Embodied Policy Success
Abstract
Sensorimotor alignment measures how sensory representations match physical motion geometry, serving as a low-cost offline predictor of robot model performance.
Robot foundation models are typically evaluated through costly closed-loop rollouts, motivating low-cost offline proxies for model capability. The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (PRH) suggests that as representations improve, modalities such as vision and language converge toward a shared statistical model of reality. We ask whether motion trajectories form another such modality: as embodied models become more capable, should their sensory representations converge toward the structure of physical motion? To test this, we propose Sensorimotor Alignment (S^2), a training-free offline metric that measures how well a model's sensory representation aligns with the geometry of physical motion. We find that S^2 correlates positively with downstream robot task success across model families, making it a low-cost offline proxy for prioritizing models before closed-loop evaluation. S^2 can also identify promising vision-language model (VLM) backbones before costly fine-tuning into vision-language-action models (VLAs). Beyond this correlation, S^2 offers representation-level explanations for phenomena observed in VLAs and world action models (WAMs). With S^2, we extend PRH to robotics and make sensorimotor alignment measurable, offering a low-cost, representation-level view of robot foundation models that closed-loop success rates alone cannot reveal.
Community
The Platonic Representation Hypothesis (Huh et al, 2024) argues that as vision and language models scale, their representation spaces converge toward a shared statistical model of reality. The idea is that images and text are different projections of the same underlying world. As models recover that world more faithfully, they begin to agree on which inputs are similar. For example, if a vision model places two images close together in the representation space, a language model tends to place their captions close together too.
In this work, we bring PRH to robotics and ask: can physical robot motion be viewed as another projection of that same world, such that more capable embodied models better align their vision and language representations with the structure of motion trajectories?
Our evidence suggests the answer is yes. To test this, we use Sensorimotor Alignment (S²), which measures the overlap between neighborhoods of a model's sensory representations and neighborhoods of end-effector trajectories. Higher alignment means episodes nearby in sensory representation space are also nearby in motor representation space.
Our first finding is that S² is positively related to downstream robot task success. We test a range of Vision-Language-Action models (VLAs) and World Action Models (WAMs) in simulation, as well as policies on real robots. Across these settings, models with higher S² tend to achieve higher task success rates. This pattern provides empirical support for extending PRH to robotics.
S² also explains, at the representation level, several phenomena that prior work has observed only through closed-loop results. For example, VLAs often ignore the language instruction and act mainly on what they see. We find that their task success correlates with the S² of their vision features, not their text features.
In practice, S² can serve as a low-cost offline proxy for identifying which models are likely to achieve higher task success before closed-loop evaluation. For instance, it can identify promising vision-language model (VLM) backbones even before costly VLA fine-tuning.
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.31670 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper