Loom-Tapestry
Collection
The Loom-Tapestry collection. These models will eventually replace weave as the largest and most advanced models. Tier 4 (massive). β’ 1 item β’ Updated
π Laucnhed Loom-Tapestry!
Loom
textilelabs
AI & ML interests
Independent builder training small/efficient models from scratch on consumer hardware (CPU-only, no cloud).
Recent Activity
updated a collection 1 day ago
Loom-Tapestry updated a model 1 day ago
textilelabs/Loom-Tapestry-2 published a model 1 day ago
textilelabs/Loom-Tapestry-2Organizations
None yet
updated a
collection 1 day ago
updated a
model 1 day ago
published a
model 1 day ago
reacted to Banaxi-Tech's post with π₯ 1 day ago
Post
1918
We're releasing BananaMind Arena.
Its a Huggingface space where you can test out different models and see they're rankings!
Check it out at Banaxi-Tech/BananaMind-Arena
Also please follow @CodeSoft for inspiring me to make it.
Its a Huggingface space where you can test out different models and see they're rankings!
Check it out at Banaxi-Tech/BananaMind-Arena
Also please follow @CodeSoft for inspiring me to make it.
updated 4
collections 1 day ago
updated a
model 2 days ago
published a
model 2 days ago
updated a
model 2 days ago
published a
model 2 days ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with π₯ 2 days ago
Post
4001
Introducing the Global LLM Download Leaderboard π
Cumulative download counts are a museum. They reward age, not relevance β a model released two years ago can sit near the top on the strength of downloads it earned long before anyone stopped using it. If you want to know what the open LLM ecosystem is actually running today, you need a different lens.
So we built one. The Global LLM Download Leaderboard ranks text-generation models by their trailing 30-day downloads, measured directly from the Hugging Face API and refreshed every day.
π VIDraft/global-llm-leaderboard
Why a 30-day window changes what you see
A cumulative chart answers "what has been popular." A 30-day chart answers "what is being adopted right now." Those are very different questions β and the second one is the one that matters if you're deciding what to build on, quantize, fine-tune, or serve this quarter. Momentum, not history.
What it shows
Global Top 300, with tabs for πΊπΈ USA Β· π¨π³ China Β· πͺπΊ EU
Six share-of-download charts: by country, by parameter size, by quantization, by type (Base / Instruct / Quantized / MoE), by release year, and by organization (Top 10)
Per-model chips for parameter size, quantization, license, and type
English / νκ΅μ΄ with automatic browser-language detection and a manual toggle
What the data reveals
The frontier is bipolar. Two countries account for the large majority of the top-300's 30-day downloads. Open-model gravity is concentrating, not dispersing.
Small is winning. A striking share of all downloads goes to sub-3B models β the clearest signal yet that on-device and cost-efficient deployment, not maximum parameter count, is driving real-world adoption.
Quantization is mainstream. GGUF, AWQ, FP8 and friends aren't a niche β a large fraction of the most-downloaded artifacts are quantized, because that's what people actually run.
Benchmarks measure what a model can do. Downloads measure what people choose to use.
Cumulative download counts are a museum. They reward age, not relevance β a model released two years ago can sit near the top on the strength of downloads it earned long before anyone stopped using it. If you want to know what the open LLM ecosystem is actually running today, you need a different lens.
So we built one. The Global LLM Download Leaderboard ranks text-generation models by their trailing 30-day downloads, measured directly from the Hugging Face API and refreshed every day.
π VIDraft/global-llm-leaderboard
Why a 30-day window changes what you see
A cumulative chart answers "what has been popular." A 30-day chart answers "what is being adopted right now." Those are very different questions β and the second one is the one that matters if you're deciding what to build on, quantize, fine-tune, or serve this quarter. Momentum, not history.
What it shows
Global Top 300, with tabs for πΊπΈ USA Β· π¨π³ China Β· πͺπΊ EU
Six share-of-download charts: by country, by parameter size, by quantization, by type (Base / Instruct / Quantized / MoE), by release year, and by organization (Top 10)
Per-model chips for parameter size, quantization, license, and type
English / νκ΅μ΄ with automatic browser-language detection and a manual toggle
What the data reveals
The frontier is bipolar. Two countries account for the large majority of the top-300's 30-day downloads. Open-model gravity is concentrating, not dispersing.
Small is winning. A striking share of all downloads goes to sub-3B models β the clearest signal yet that on-device and cost-efficient deployment, not maximum parameter count, is driving real-world adoption.
Quantization is mainstream. GGUF, AWQ, FP8 and friends aren't a niche β a large fraction of the most-downloaded artifacts are quantized, because that's what people actually run.
Benchmarks measure what a model can do. Downloads measure what people choose to use.
- 5 replies
updated a
model 2 days ago